FIND YOUR NEXT THING TO TRY

#tested

A small corner of the library, connected by one useful idea.

16 things to try

🛒
OFP SCORE9.2/10
Research WORKS

Should I Actually Buy This?

Let AI challenge the purchase before it recommends another shiny thing.

WHY 9.2?

It starts with your real constraints, separates needs from wants and demands dated evidence before recommending a purchase.

🧭
OFP SCORE9.0/10
Research WORKS

Build an AI Opportunity Research OS

A five-agent research system that looks for evidence before it falls in love with an idea.

WHY 9.0?

Its evidence labels, sceptical validator and file-backed memory make research unusually traceable; the five-agent setup is still heavier than most people need.

🥗
OFP SCORE9.1/10
Nutrition WORKS

Practical Meal Planner for My Fitness Goal

Flexible meals, substitutions and one grocery list—without fake precision.

WHY 9.1?

Budget, location, substitutions and flexible portions create a genuinely usable plan while keeping medical nutrition outside the AI’s role.

💪
OFP SCORE9.0/10
Fitness WORKS

Build Muscle at Home

A progressive home strength plan built around your equipment and recovery.

WHY 9.0?

Progression, reps-in-reserve and repeat-week rules turn limited equipment into a coherent strength plan rather than a random exercise list.

📉
OFP SCORE8.5/10
Wellness WORKS

Sustainable Fat-Loss-at-Home Plan

A realistic routine focused on habits and trends—not crash-diet promises.

WHY 8.5?

It rejects crash-diet promises and focuses on repeatable habits, but individual weight response remains too complex for an AI to predict.

🤸
OFP SCORE9.2/10
Fitness WORKS

No-Equipment Workout That Progresses

A bodyweight plan with real progressions, regressions and time limits.

WHY 9.2?

Clear effort targets, regressions and one-variable-at-a-time progression make this unusually complete for a bodyweight prompt.

🔄
OFP SCORE8.7/10
Wellness WORKS

Build My Complete Fitness Reset

A six-week routine connecting training, movement, food habits and recovery.

WHY 8.7?

The phased structure connects training, movement, food habits and recovery, though its broad scope still requires honest user input.

🏠
OFP SCORE9.0/10
Fitness WORKS

Build My Realistic Home Fitness Plan

A cautious starter plan built around your real life, not a fitness fantasy.

WHY 9.0?

It gathers the right context, protects against unsafe personalisation and produces a conservative plan that fits the user’s actual time.

OFP SCORE9.1/10
Research WORKS

Coach Me From My Garmin Data

Turn a Garmin export into a cautious, evidence-based training review.

WHY 9.1?

It checks the available fields, separates evidence from inference and builds a conservative plan without hiding the paid connector requirement.

📈
OFP SCORE1.5/10
Research× BULLSHIT

AI Predicts Tomorrow’s Winning Stock

A fluent forecast is not privileged knowledge of tomorrow’s market.

WHY 1.5?

Fluent scenarios are not future knowledge, making this an unsafe basis for real financial decisions.

🪄
OFP SCORE2.1/10
Research× BULLSHIT

The Zero-Hallucination Prompt

A magic sentence cannot force an AI to be 100% factual.

WHY 2.1?

No wording can guarantee factual output; the central promise is impossible even with better constraints.

💸
OFP SCORE6.2/10
Travel SORT OF

AI Plans the Cheapest Flight

A good planner is not automatically a live price engine.

WHY 6.2?

It can improve your search strategy, but it cannot guarantee the cheapest live fare without current data.

📸
OFP SCORE8.6/10
Food WORKS

Photo to Fridge Recipe

Can a photo of your fridge produce dinner? Mostly, with one important check.

WHY 8.6?

The confirmation step catches visual mistakes, making a clever trick useful rather than overconfident.

🕵️
OFP SCORE1.8/10
Research× BULLSHIT

AI Detects Lies From Writing

A confident claim that collapses under basic scrutiny.

WHY 1.8?

Writing alone cannot reveal deception reliably; a confident verdict here is actively misleading.

🎧
OFP SCORE5.8/10
Weird AI SORT OF

The Spotify Personality Trick

Can AI really read your personality from a playlist? We tried it.

WHY 5.8?

It can describe playlist patterns, but the personality conclusions remain mostly projection.